About the Censorship Archive
A free-speech transparency project documenting how major platforms moderate speech — and where that moderation may be applied inconsistently.
Evidence over rhetoric
We let screenshots and side-by-side comparisons speak for themselves. The interface stays neutral; the record stays factual.
Transparency, not activism
This is a documentation project, not a campaign. We catalog moderation actions across all platforms, categories, and viewpoints.
A public research tool
Cases are searchable and exportable for journalists, researchers, and anyone tracking how platforms enforce their rules.
Mission
The Censorship Archive exists to create a transparent, searchable public record of content moderation decisions — particularly cases that suggest double standards in how religious, political, and ideological speech is treated across major platforms.
We do not host the original censored content. We host user-submitted screenshots and neutral commentary. We do not endorse any specific religion, ideology, or political position. The project is grounded in free-expression principles and the belief that public accountability requires public evidence.
What we accept
- Screenshots of removed, shadow-banned, restricted, or labeled content.
- Side-by-side comparisons with comparable content left unmoderated.
- Neutral, factual descriptions and accurate metadata.
- Links to original posts or archived versions when available.
What we do not accept
- Fabricated, doctored, or misleading evidence.
- Illegal content, doxxing, or personal information.
- Content uploaded to incite violence or harassment.
Staff removals are logged with public reasons. Community members can flag submissions for review.